Monday, July 25, 2011

All is not Quiet on the Plastic Bag Front

(Image by M. Bartosch)

Monday, Monday, Monday! Let's start the week off good with some good news and facts. Click below for a really good article that outlines the dangers and many causes of plastic bag use and how the world is turning around and actually thinking outside of grave convenience. Its also showcasing how the US seems to be behind in many trends far beyond those of policy. Its a good read and I hope you all enjoy and learn something new. As I always say, if you aren't learning anything new, you might as well be dead.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-plastic-bag-wars-20110725

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Attack on Clean Water!

I hope everyone is enjoying another happy Hump Day. It's all down hill from here folks.

I've been scouring through the Internet world and boy does it seem aflame today. The recent government cutbacks are diminishing every single corner of our social policies that requires the up most attention. Not only is Medicaid, SSI and school budgets being drained to the last drop, but they are also trying to rid of the Clean Water Act.

A lot of these politicians claim that science does not hold all the answers and that many of our accepted, scientifically analysed reports and facts are not true. Case in point: Global Warming. This "phenomenon" has been acknowledged for more than 2 decades yet the US government has done little to advance regulation and move towards sustainability in an environmentally friendly way.

And mind you, global warming is not even a top priority. The real point of this article is that we have more than 6.5 billion people in the world and with all the water that encompasses more than 2/3 of the Earth, only 1% of that is drinkable. Now with them eliminating or drastically de-funding the Clean Water Act, how are we going to be able to provide a birth given right to this resource for those billions of people?

I wonder if congress even asks themselves these questions. And I hope you guys wonder the same and sign the petition (link below) to urge them to re-think their strategies or face voting consequences in the coming elections.

http://pol.moveon.org/cleanairactvote/

House Committee Launches Most Significant Attack on the Clean Water Act in at Least 15 Years

Steve Fleischli

Senior Attorney, NRDC


Not satisfied with merely trying to undo the Clean Air Act, the House of Representatives has now decided to attack the federal Clean Water Act with the introduction of H.R. 2018, which is slated for mark-up tomorrow (Wednesday) in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The bill, sponsored by Congressman John Mica of Florida, strips EPA of critical oversight authority that for decades has resulted in improved water quality across the country. And it's not just Republicans leading the charge. Several Democrats, including Representatives Nick Rahall (WV), Jason Altmire (PA) and Tim Holden (PA), have co-sponsored the legislation.

The bill seems to be a reaction to EPA's recent important efforts to protect water quality in Florida, West Virginia and on the Chesapeake Bay. But its impact is far broader than that.
Also called the "Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011," H.R 2018 takes "cooperation" to a whole new level by stripping EPA of its ability to protect national water quality without state-by-state approval. Among other things, the bill:
  • Limits EPA's ability to effectively implement or make necessary improvements to state water quality standards to deal with modern pollution challenges.
  • Prevents EPA from improving numeric criteria for pollutants that have led to dead zones in the Chesapeake Bay and Gulf of Mexico.
  • Restricts EPA from upgrading standards for toxic pollutants where narrative standards only provide very limited protection (a common example being state standards that prohibit the "discharge of toxic pollutants in toxic amounts").
  • Prevents EPA from vetoing state-issued Clean Water Act permits even if EPA concludes those permits are not protective of water quality.
  • Blocks EPA's ability to withhold federal funding to states even if EPA determines the state's implementation of water quality standards is not protective of water quality.
Basically, H.R. 2018 takes the "federal" out of the federal Clean Water Act and highlights a new disdain for the federal government's role in environmental protection. Yet it is this federal law and EPA's oversight that have resulted in so many improvements to water quality across America since the Clean Water Act's passage in 1972.

The federal Clean Water Act provides a safety net for waterways across the country, where states must implement minimum provisions to protect water quality. States can always do more if they so choose, but the law recognizes that Americans deserve a minimum standard of protection no matter where they live, and the Clean Water Act is designed to prevent a "race to the bottom" in places where the benefits of clean water may be ignored for short term economic or political gain.
By hamstringing the EPA, H.R. 2018 would remove the most critical piece of the puzzle and would take away this safety net.

Indeed, sponsors of the bill seem intent on taking us back to the "good old days" of limited federal involvement when rivers like the Cuyahoga caught fire and Lake Erie was declared dead -- and when states sued other states because pollution flowing from an upstream state ruined a neighboring state's waterway.

Yet these past horrors and the legislative history of the Clean Water Act reveal why the federal role was and remains so important: before 1972 many states lacked any approved water quality standards and national efforts to abate and control water pollution were "inadequate in every vital aspect."
I say this is the worse attack on the Clean Water Act in at least 15 years because it is hard to compare which is worse, the Dirty Water Bill of 1995 or today's H.R. 2018. Both contained provisions to paralyze EPA's Clean Water Act duties - the Dirty Water Act under the guise of cost-benefit analysis, H.R. 2018 under the guise of states' rights. But one thing that is easy to see is that H.R. 2018 will undermine almost 40 years of progress in cleaning up America's waterways, and it will remove America's most vital safety net for protecting water quality across all 50 states.
This blog is cross-posted on NRDC's Switchboard.

Friday, July 15, 2011

Forget the Spinach Popeye ... how about some Seaweed?

It's finally Friday internet-landians and I can finally take a breather from the long week and I hope you can too. Wednesday I posted about the oil spill that occured a couple of weeks ago (or was it last week? I've lost track of time) in Montana. I mentioned that we definitely need to start moving away from oil as our source to power our economy and lives.

And low and behold, to my luck, I came across this awesome article regarding seaweed as a biofuel. Its a great outline and showcase of how this would work but of course nothing is ever easy. It's a pretty long read but it also comes with a video. You know how much we love those. Another good read on how the ocean can bring to us benefits beyond the swell and rip curl. But always remember, if we are to start harvesting kelp for biofuel, it has to be done in an environmentally friendly way. With dedication and great minds, this can easily be accomplished. Have a good weekend folks!


Seaweed in the Fuel Tank?
Jessica Marshall
By Jessica Marshall 
THE GIST
  • Kelp and other seaweeds could be used for biofuel production.
  • Kelp grows quickly and doesn't compete with food production like land-based biofuel crops do.
  • So far, the difficulties of cultivating and harvesting kelp make it cost ineffective.
giant kelp
Kelp and other seaweed could be biofuels of the future, avoiding competition with food crops for land and scarce freshwater resources -- limitations that plague land-based biofuel prospects.
Researchers envision fast-growing cultivated kelp forests growing downward into the water, anchored on webs of rope, or porous sheets of material that roll with the waves. Offshore wind farms could be convenient places to grow seaweed biofuels in the future, some say.
So far, the process is not economical, but rising oil prices, or the possibility of first extracting higher-value products from the seaweed such as food additives or protein for fish food before converting the remainder to fuel, could change that.

NEWS: Could Cheap Algae Oil Power Our Energy Future?

"We've got a lot of seaweed growing out in the sea and we're not really using it. It's not taking up land. It's not food which could also be eaten," said Jessica Adams of Aberystwyth University in Wales.
"They grow very fast," added Yannick Lerat of the Technical Research Center on Seaweed in Pleubian, France. "The amount of organic matter you can produce per year per surface is about 10 times higher than you can find in croplands without GM organisms."
"There is no need to use freshwater," he continued. "Freshwater in some parts of the world is becoming really a tricky resource."
As with land plants, the carbohydrates in the tissues of seaweed can be converted in various ways to fuels. They can be burned via a process known as pyrolysis to make oil; fermented with bacteria into ethanol; or converted into methane via anaerobic digestion.
Because seaweed is buoyed by water, it does not need to make the woody compound lignin to help it stand up against gravity, like land plants do in growing their stalks and trunks.

Gnarly lignin resists degradation, a key obstacle in bringing terrestrial biofuels made from biomass like corn stalks or tree crops to market. This makes seaweed easier to convert to fuels, researchers said.
"There are issues with harvesting it from the wild for it to be sustainable," said Michele Stanley of the Scottish Association of Marine Sciences, who is a leader of a program investigating fuels from seaweed. "We would support cultivation."

In Norway, wild kelp is harvested on a five-year rotation for production and sale of alginates -- used as stabilizers and emulsifiers in foods, among other things. Wild harvest would not be feasible for the quantities needed for biofuels, Stanley said.

Pål Bakken, founder and head of Norwegian company Seaweed Energy Solutions AS, is working to develop better methods for cultivation.
His company has patented devices for growing kelp in sheets anchored to the seafloor at a single point, which allows the sheets to flow with the wave action, simulating a more natural growth environment.

This should allow simpler, cheaper cultivation and harvesting, he says, eliminating the tangly, multi-anchored rope systems of traditional Asian seaweed culture and perhaps making deeper waters available for cultivation.
Like land plants, kelp needs sufficient nutrients to grow, so it would need nitrogen fertilizer to grow in open water far from coastal nutrient sources.
But cultivated kelp could be a useful way to clean up waters full of nutrient runoff. For example, Norway's salmon farming releases enough nitrogen to support 9 million metric tons of kelp, Bakken said.

It is still unclear how the economics of seaweed biofuels shake out, according to experts. Stanley is investigating the question and hopes to have an answer in the next couple of years.
"There is no way this would be competitive on day one," Bakken said. "Incentives will be important in the beginning."

NEWS: How Much Fossil Fuel is in the Earth?

Lerat says oil prices will need to be somewhere around $300 a barrel before it's economical, but he and others say extracting higher value chemicals first could change the equation.
"The more valuable things you can get out, the better," Adams said.
Indeed, the idea of the "biorefinery," analogous to the petrochemical refinery where high-value petrochemicals are taken out of crude oil before fuel is refined, is a popular vision of the future for terrestrial and marine biofuels alike.

Components of bioplastics, nutritional supplements, protein for fish food or even the phosphorus-laden ash from seaweed could be possible profit-turners. The remaining, carbohydrate-rich biomass could be fermented or digested to ethanol and methane for fuel. Bakken notes that the available area for cultivation could be "almost unlimited and believes seaweed can make "a very large contribution" to the liquid fuels industry. His company claims that about 3.7 metric tons of kelp are needed to produce a barrel of ethanol.

Current global production is about 15 million metric tons, largely for alginate and food, and mostly in China and Japan. In a release from last year, Bakken's company reported that using 0.05 percent of Europe's coastal areas to cultivate kelp could supply 4.7 percent of the 2008 global ethanol production.
For now, the crop would be seasonal. Adams presented work this week at a meeting of the Society for Experimental Biology in Glasgow, Scotland, noting that carbohydrate levels in kelp on the Welsh coast rise tenfold from their wintertime lows to 35 to 40 percent in July, a finding that others have agreed with.

Seaweed crops would likely be bred for desirable attributes over time, including a longer cultivation season. Prudence would be needed in what species were introduced where, researchers agreed, to avoid problems with species invasions.
"I think this is really big," Bakken said. "It's not only the seaweed. It's the shift toward thinking 'blue.' We are so land-based. I think this will open up all kinds of industries related to the sea. It's finally beginning now."

http://news.discovery.com/autos/seaweed-kelp-fuel-cars-crops-110711.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DiscoveryNews-Autos-News+%28Discovery+News+-+Autos+News%29#mkcpgn=rssnws1

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Another spill in a beautiful neighborhood

This is unbelievable! With all these corporate henchmen winding up in congress and pushing forward deregulation and agendas to increase profits at the expense of our natural resources and homes, you'd expect to see a riot. Where are the pissed off folks at??????

Another oil spill, this time in Montana in the middle of the country. You know this oil is going to spread down the Yellowstone River into countless other regions creating many problems and destroying wildlife for years to come.

We here at CP have said it before and will say it again, oil is not a resource we should invest in any longer. We need new forms of fuel, many of which are already in the works and are sustainable and environmentally friendly. What i suggest doing is hitting Exxon where it hurts the most ... their pockets. Don't buy their gas. Go to one of the lesser of many evils like 76. I've stopped going to Shell, BP and Chevron due to all the debacles and carelesness that they've been creating.

Read the article below and just try to imagine waking up to some shit like that. And pardon the French, but sometimes you just have to let the steam out.



yellowstone oil spill

The spread of an estimated 1,000 barrels or 42,000 gallons of crude oil along the flooded banks of the Yellowstone River in Montana is becoming increasingly difficult to capture since an ExxonMobile pipeline ruptured late Friday night.

The break in the pipe near Laurel, Mont., forced an immediate evacuation of about 140 people from the town to protect them from possible explosions and dangerous fumes.
Brent Peters, the fire chief for Laurel, told the Associated Press that once the leak was detected he asked the three oil companies with pipelines in the area to shut down their flows. The residents were allowed to return to their homes around 4 a.m. on Saturday. ExxonMobile reports that pipeline pumps were shut down seven minutes after the loss of pressure in the system.

While the fumes have dissipated to safer levels, the smell of the oil still permeates the air downstream and 12 miles to the east through the city of Billings, where the oil pipeline terminates. ExxonMobile, Cenex Harvest Refinery and Conoco Phillips all have refineries in Billings. The 12-inch diameter ExxonMobile pipe that ruptured was buried six feet below the riverbed and carrying crude oil from Belfry, Mont.

ExxonMobile clean-up crews from the Billings refinery laid out absorbent material and booms along the banks and across the Yellowstone River on Saturday, but the fast flows and flooding has hampered efforts to contain the spread. ExxonMobile sent a team of 50 more oil spill responders to the area on Sunday.

The Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, and the International Bird Rescue as well as local and state authorities are also on the scene.

The Associate Press reported that oil from the slick had reached Hysham, Mont., by late Saturday night, a distance of nearly 100 miles east of Laurel.
"Nobody's been able to lay their eyes on the pipe," Peters told the AP. "Right now, the Yellowstone River is at flood stage. The bank isn't stable enough for anybody to get close.



Oil spills into Montana's Yellowstone River

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Plastics: An enemy of the ocean state

We here at Coastal Playground pride ourselves in being able to take part in making sure our oceans are clean and safe. Heck, we enjoy the beach just as much as the next guy and seeing trash littered and mixed in the sand is an awful site. Its like trashing a zen garden. Who does that? Well, many Americans do. And one of the leading pollutants in and around our beaches is plastic.
With the new green movement that appears to be happening across the nation, you are starting to see many companies focusing on promoting environmentally friendly and sustainable products. But as is normal nowadays with corporations that are only out to make big bucks, a lot of the marketing can be very misleading.
Below is an article I found which helps explain the differences between the types of recycling that can occur with the many different types of plastics we have. Some even claiming to be environmentally friendly, when in fact, they are not.

It's a good read and I encourage everyone to read. The first line of defense in keeping the oceans clean and safe is by recycling at home. And we're glad to be bringing this attention to our readers so spread the word to friends and family to keep the movement going. Nothing but positive benefits can come from this, for us and the environment.



http://www.alternet.org/environment/151543/compostable_or_recyclable_why_bioplastics_are_causing_an_environmental_headache

Friday, July 1, 2011

Summer's just around the corner ... but don't jump in the water just yet.

Happy Friday, Happy 1st of the month and in a few days, Happy Independence day.

And what better way to spend this hot weekend than at the beach!!
But then I came across this interesting article from MSN in regards to the quality of the water in and around the nations beaches. The most important thing to consider at all times is the health and well being of our communities and that is what Coastal Playground is all about! Keeping the beaches clean and safe not only for us but for all the creatures that share the same environments.

We will be holding multiple beach clean ups throughout the summer so keep an eye out for the dates. And remember to visit our store, where every purchase you make, 50% of that goes to fund beach clean ups!



http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/27/6958891-report-highlights-poor-water-quality-at-nations-beaches