(Image by M. Bartosch)
Monday, Monday, Monday! Let's start the week off good with some good news and facts. Click below for a really good article that outlines the dangers and many causes of plastic bag use and how the world is turning around and actually thinking outside of grave convenience. Its also showcasing how the US seems to be behind in many trends far beyond those of policy. Its a good read and I hope you all enjoy and learn something new. As I always say, if you aren't learning anything new, you might as well be dead.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-plastic-bag-wars-20110725
Coastal Playground is devoted to the conservation of our beaches and encourages people to enact change through positive outlets. Our Vision: To fashion a generation of consumers that choose to make a difference. How it works, the 50/50:”For every piece of apparel we sell, 50% of the proceeds will go towards organizing future beach cleanups and events.” For additional information on CP 50/50 you can also check out: www.CoastalPlayground.com
Monday, July 25, 2011
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Attack on Clean Water!
I hope everyone is enjoying another happy Hump Day. It's all down hill from here folks.
I've been scouring through the Internet world and boy does it seem aflame today. The recent government cutbacks are diminishing every single corner of our social policies that requires the up most attention. Not only is Medicaid, SSI and school budgets being drained to the last drop, but they are also trying to rid of the Clean Water Act.
A lot of these politicians claim that science does not hold all the answers and that many of our accepted, scientifically analysed reports and facts are not true. Case in point: Global Warming. This "phenomenon" has been acknowledged for more than 2 decades yet the US government has done little to advance regulation and move towards sustainability in an environmentally friendly way.
And mind you, global warming is not even a top priority. The real point of this article is that we have more than 6.5 billion people in the world and with all the water that encompasses more than 2/3 of the Earth, only 1% of that is drinkable. Now with them eliminating or drastically de-funding the Clean Water Act, how are we going to be able to provide a birth given right to this resource for those billions of people?
I wonder if congress even asks themselves these questions. And I hope you guys wonder the same and sign the petition (link below) to urge them to re-think their strategies or face voting consequences in the coming elections.
http://pol.moveon.org/cleanairactvote/
House Committee Launches Most Significant Attack on the Clean Water Act in at Least 15 Years

Steve Fleischli
Senior Attorney, NRDC
Not satisfied with merely trying to undo the Clean Air Act, the House of Representatives has now decided to attack the federal Clean Water Act with the introduction of H.R. 2018, which is slated for mark-up tomorrow (Wednesday) in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The bill, sponsored by Congressman John Mica of Florida, strips EPA of critical oversight authority that for decades has resulted in improved water quality across the country. And it's not just Republicans leading the charge. Several Democrats, including Representatives Nick Rahall (WV), Jason Altmire (PA) and Tim Holden (PA), have co-sponsored the legislation.
The bill seems to be a reaction to EPA's recent important efforts to protect water quality in Florida, West Virginia and on the Chesapeake Bay. But its impact is far broader than that.
Also called the "Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011," H.R 2018 takes "cooperation" to a whole new level by stripping EPA of its ability to protect national water quality without state-by-state approval. Among other things, the bill:
The federal Clean Water Act provides a safety net for waterways across the country, where states must implement minimum provisions to protect water quality. States can always do more if they so choose, but the law recognizes that Americans deserve a minimum standard of protection no matter where they live, and the Clean Water Act is designed to prevent a "race to the bottom" in places where the benefits of clean water may be ignored for short term economic or political gain.
By hamstringing the EPA, H.R. 2018 would remove the most critical piece of the puzzle and would take away this safety net.
Indeed, sponsors of the bill seem intent on taking us back to the "good old days" of limited federal involvement when rivers like the Cuyahoga caught fire and Lake Erie was declared dead -- and when states sued other states because pollution flowing from an upstream state ruined a neighboring state's waterway.
Yet these past horrors and the legislative history of the Clean Water Act reveal why the federal role was and remains so important: before 1972 many states lacked any approved water quality standards and national efforts to abate and control water pollution were "inadequate in every vital aspect."
I say this is the worse attack on the Clean Water Act in at least 15 years because it is hard to compare which is worse, the Dirty Water Bill of 1995 or today's H.R. 2018. Both contained provisions to paralyze EPA's Clean Water Act duties - the Dirty Water Act under the guise of cost-benefit analysis, H.R. 2018 under the guise of states' rights. But one thing that is easy to see is that H.R. 2018 will undermine almost 40 years of progress in cleaning up America's waterways, and it will remove America's most vital safety net for protecting water quality across all 50 states.
This blog is cross-posted on NRDC's Switchboard.
I've been scouring through the Internet world and boy does it seem aflame today. The recent government cutbacks are diminishing every single corner of our social policies that requires the up most attention. Not only is Medicaid, SSI and school budgets being drained to the last drop, but they are also trying to rid of the Clean Water Act.
A lot of these politicians claim that science does not hold all the answers and that many of our accepted, scientifically analysed reports and facts are not true. Case in point: Global Warming. This "phenomenon" has been acknowledged for more than 2 decades yet the US government has done little to advance regulation and move towards sustainability in an environmentally friendly way.
And mind you, global warming is not even a top priority. The real point of this article is that we have more than 6.5 billion people in the world and with all the water that encompasses more than 2/3 of the Earth, only 1% of that is drinkable. Now with them eliminating or drastically de-funding the Clean Water Act, how are we going to be able to provide a birth given right to this resource for those billions of people?
I wonder if congress even asks themselves these questions. And I hope you guys wonder the same and sign the petition (link below) to urge them to re-think their strategies or face voting consequences in the coming elections.
http://pol.moveon.org/cleanairactvote/
House Committee Launches Most Significant Attack on the Clean Water Act in at Least 15 Years
Steve Fleischli
Senior Attorney, NRDC
Not satisfied with merely trying to undo the Clean Air Act, the House of Representatives has now decided to attack the federal Clean Water Act with the introduction of H.R. 2018, which is slated for mark-up tomorrow (Wednesday) in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The bill, sponsored by Congressman John Mica of Florida, strips EPA of critical oversight authority that for decades has resulted in improved water quality across the country. And it's not just Republicans leading the charge. Several Democrats, including Representatives Nick Rahall (WV), Jason Altmire (PA) and Tim Holden (PA), have co-sponsored the legislation.
The bill seems to be a reaction to EPA's recent important efforts to protect water quality in Florida, West Virginia and on the Chesapeake Bay. But its impact is far broader than that.
Also called the "Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011," H.R 2018 takes "cooperation" to a whole new level by stripping EPA of its ability to protect national water quality without state-by-state approval. Among other things, the bill:
- Limits EPA's ability to effectively implement or make necessary improvements to state water quality standards to deal with modern pollution challenges.
- Prevents EPA from improving numeric criteria for pollutants that have led to dead zones in the Chesapeake Bay and Gulf of Mexico.
- Restricts EPA from upgrading standards for toxic pollutants where narrative standards only provide very limited protection (a common example being state standards that prohibit the "discharge of toxic pollutants in toxic amounts").
- Prevents EPA from vetoing state-issued Clean Water Act permits even if EPA concludes those permits are not protective of water quality.
- Blocks EPA's ability to withhold federal funding to states even if EPA determines the state's implementation of water quality standards is not protective of water quality.
The federal Clean Water Act provides a safety net for waterways across the country, where states must implement minimum provisions to protect water quality. States can always do more if they so choose, but the law recognizes that Americans deserve a minimum standard of protection no matter where they live, and the Clean Water Act is designed to prevent a "race to the bottom" in places where the benefits of clean water may be ignored for short term economic or political gain.
By hamstringing the EPA, H.R. 2018 would remove the most critical piece of the puzzle and would take away this safety net.
Indeed, sponsors of the bill seem intent on taking us back to the "good old days" of limited federal involvement when rivers like the Cuyahoga caught fire and Lake Erie was declared dead -- and when states sued other states because pollution flowing from an upstream state ruined a neighboring state's waterway.
Yet these past horrors and the legislative history of the Clean Water Act reveal why the federal role was and remains so important: before 1972 many states lacked any approved water quality standards and national efforts to abate and control water pollution were "inadequate in every vital aspect."
I say this is the worse attack on the Clean Water Act in at least 15 years because it is hard to compare which is worse, the Dirty Water Bill of 1995 or today's H.R. 2018. Both contained provisions to paralyze EPA's Clean Water Act duties - the Dirty Water Act under the guise of cost-benefit analysis, H.R. 2018 under the guise of states' rights. But one thing that is easy to see is that H.R. 2018 will undermine almost 40 years of progress in cleaning up America's waterways, and it will remove America's most vital safety net for protecting water quality across all 50 states.
This blog is cross-posted on NRDC's Switchboard.
Friday, July 15, 2011
Forget the Spinach Popeye ... how about some Seaweed?
It's finally Friday internet-landians and I can finally take a breather from the long week and I hope you can too. Wednesday I posted about the oil spill that occured a couple of weeks ago (or was it last week? I've lost track of time) in Montana. I mentioned that we definitely need to start moving away from oil as our source to power our economy and lives.
And low and behold, to my luck, I came across this awesome article regarding seaweed as a biofuel. Its a great outline and showcase of how this would work but of course nothing is ever easy. It's a pretty long read but it also comes with a video. You know how much we love those. Another good read on how the ocean can bring to us benefits beyond the swell and rip curl. But always remember, if we are to start harvesting kelp for biofuel, it has to be done in an environmentally friendly way. With dedication and great minds, this can easily be accomplished. Have a good weekend folks!
Seaweed in the Fuel Tank?
And low and behold, to my luck, I came across this awesome article regarding seaweed as a biofuel. Its a great outline and showcase of how this would work but of course nothing is ever easy. It's a pretty long read but it also comes with a video. You know how much we love those. Another good read on how the ocean can bring to us benefits beyond the swell and rip curl. But always remember, if we are to start harvesting kelp for biofuel, it has to be done in an environmentally friendly way. With dedication and great minds, this can easily be accomplished. Have a good weekend folks!
Seaweed in the Fuel Tank?
THE GIST
- Kelp and other seaweeds could be used for biofuel production.
- Kelp grows quickly and doesn't compete with food production like land-based biofuel crops do.
- So far, the difficulties of cultivating and harvesting kelp make it cost ineffective.
Kelp and other seaweed could be biofuels of the future, avoiding competition with food crops for land and scarce freshwater resources -- limitations that plague land-based biofuel prospects.
Researchers envision fast-growing cultivated kelp forests growing downward into the water, anchored on webs of rope, or porous sheets of material that roll with the waves. Offshore wind farms could be convenient places to grow seaweed biofuels in the future, some say.
So far, the process is not economical, but rising oil prices, or the possibility of first extracting higher-value products from the seaweed such as food additives or protein for fish food before converting the remainder to fuel, could change that.
NEWS: Could Cheap Algae Oil Power Our Energy Future?
"We've got a lot of seaweed growing out in the sea and we're not really using it. It's not taking up land. It's not food which could also be eaten," said Jessica Adams of Aberystwyth University in Wales.
"They grow very fast," added Yannick Lerat of the Technical Research Center on Seaweed in Pleubian, France. "The amount of organic matter you can produce per year per surface is about 10 times higher than you can find in croplands without GM organisms."
"There is no need to use freshwater," he continued. "Freshwater in some parts of the world is becoming really a tricky resource."
As with land plants, the carbohydrates in the tissues of seaweed can be converted in various ways to fuels. They can be burned via a process known as pyrolysis to make oil; fermented with bacteria into ethanol; or converted into methane via anaerobic digestion.
Because seaweed is buoyed by water, it does not need to make the woody compound lignin to help it stand up against gravity, like land plants do in growing their stalks and trunks.
Gnarly lignin resists degradation, a key obstacle in bringing terrestrial biofuels made from biomass like corn stalks or tree crops to market. This makes seaweed easier to convert to fuels, researchers said.
"There are issues with harvesting it from the wild for it to be sustainable," said Michele Stanley of the Scottish Association of Marine Sciences, who is a leader of a program investigating fuels from seaweed. "We would support cultivation."
In Norway, wild kelp is harvested on a five-year rotation for production and sale of alginates -- used as stabilizers and emulsifiers in foods, among other things. Wild harvest would not be feasible for the quantities needed for biofuels, Stanley said.
Pål Bakken, founder and head of Norwegian company Seaweed Energy Solutions AS, is working to develop better methods for cultivation.
His company has patented devices for growing kelp in sheets anchored to the seafloor at a single point, which allows the sheets to flow with the wave action, simulating a more natural growth environment.
This should allow simpler, cheaper cultivation and harvesting, he says, eliminating the tangly, multi-anchored rope systems of traditional Asian seaweed culture and perhaps making deeper waters available for cultivation.
Like land plants, kelp needs sufficient nutrients to grow, so it would need nitrogen fertilizer to grow in open water far from coastal nutrient sources.
But cultivated kelp could be a useful way to clean up waters full of nutrient runoff. For example, Norway's salmon farming releases enough nitrogen to support 9 million metric tons of kelp, Bakken said.
It is still unclear how the economics of seaweed biofuels shake out, according to experts. Stanley is investigating the question and hopes to have an answer in the next couple of years.
"There is no way this would be competitive on day one," Bakken said. "Incentives will be important in the beginning."
NEWS: How Much Fossil Fuel is in the Earth?
Lerat says oil prices will need to be somewhere around $300 a barrel before it's economical, but he and others say extracting higher value chemicals first could change the equation.
"The more valuable things you can get out, the better," Adams said.
Indeed, the idea of the "biorefinery," analogous to the petrochemical refinery where high-value petrochemicals are taken out of crude oil before fuel is refined, is a popular vision of the future for terrestrial and marine biofuels alike.
Components of bioplastics, nutritional supplements, protein for fish food or even the phosphorus-laden ash from seaweed could be possible profit-turners. The remaining, carbohydrate-rich biomass could be fermented or digested to ethanol and methane for fuel. Bakken notes that the available area for cultivation could be "almost unlimited and believes seaweed can make "a very large contribution" to the liquid fuels industry. His company claims that about 3.7 metric tons of kelp are needed to produce a barrel of ethanol.
Current global production is about 15 million metric tons, largely for alginate and food, and mostly in China and Japan. In a release from last year, Bakken's company reported that using 0.05 percent of Europe's coastal areas to cultivate kelp could supply 4.7 percent of the 2008 global ethanol production.
For now, the crop would be seasonal. Adams presented work this week at a meeting of the Society for Experimental Biology in Glasgow, Scotland, noting that carbohydrate levels in kelp on the Welsh coast rise tenfold from their wintertime lows to 35 to 40 percent in July, a finding that others have agreed with.
Seaweed crops would likely be bred for desirable attributes over time, including a longer cultivation season. Prudence would be needed in what species were introduced where, researchers agreed, to avoid problems with species invasions.
"I think this is really big," Bakken said. "It's not only the seaweed. It's the shift toward thinking 'blue.' We are so land-based. I think this will open up all kinds of industries related to the sea. It's finally beginning now."
http://news.discovery.com/autos/seaweed-kelp-fuel-cars-crops-110711.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DiscoveryNews-Autos-News+%28Discovery+News+-+Autos+News%29#mkcpgn=rssnws1
Researchers envision fast-growing cultivated kelp forests growing downward into the water, anchored on webs of rope, or porous sheets of material that roll with the waves. Offshore wind farms could be convenient places to grow seaweed biofuels in the future, some say.
So far, the process is not economical, but rising oil prices, or the possibility of first extracting higher-value products from the seaweed such as food additives or protein for fish food before converting the remainder to fuel, could change that.
NEWS: Could Cheap Algae Oil Power Our Energy Future?
"We've got a lot of seaweed growing out in the sea and we're not really using it. It's not taking up land. It's not food which could also be eaten," said Jessica Adams of Aberystwyth University in Wales.
"They grow very fast," added Yannick Lerat of the Technical Research Center on Seaweed in Pleubian, France. "The amount of organic matter you can produce per year per surface is about 10 times higher than you can find in croplands without GM organisms."
"There is no need to use freshwater," he continued. "Freshwater in some parts of the world is becoming really a tricky resource."
As with land plants, the carbohydrates in the tissues of seaweed can be converted in various ways to fuels. They can be burned via a process known as pyrolysis to make oil; fermented with bacteria into ethanol; or converted into methane via anaerobic digestion.
Because seaweed is buoyed by water, it does not need to make the woody compound lignin to help it stand up against gravity, like land plants do in growing their stalks and trunks.
Gnarly lignin resists degradation, a key obstacle in bringing terrestrial biofuels made from biomass like corn stalks or tree crops to market. This makes seaweed easier to convert to fuels, researchers said.
"There are issues with harvesting it from the wild for it to be sustainable," said Michele Stanley of the Scottish Association of Marine Sciences, who is a leader of a program investigating fuels from seaweed. "We would support cultivation."
In Norway, wild kelp is harvested on a five-year rotation for production and sale of alginates -- used as stabilizers and emulsifiers in foods, among other things. Wild harvest would not be feasible for the quantities needed for biofuels, Stanley said.
Pål Bakken, founder and head of Norwegian company Seaweed Energy Solutions AS, is working to develop better methods for cultivation.
His company has patented devices for growing kelp in sheets anchored to the seafloor at a single point, which allows the sheets to flow with the wave action, simulating a more natural growth environment.
This should allow simpler, cheaper cultivation and harvesting, he says, eliminating the tangly, multi-anchored rope systems of traditional Asian seaweed culture and perhaps making deeper waters available for cultivation.
Like land plants, kelp needs sufficient nutrients to grow, so it would need nitrogen fertilizer to grow in open water far from coastal nutrient sources.
But cultivated kelp could be a useful way to clean up waters full of nutrient runoff. For example, Norway's salmon farming releases enough nitrogen to support 9 million metric tons of kelp, Bakken said.
It is still unclear how the economics of seaweed biofuels shake out, according to experts. Stanley is investigating the question and hopes to have an answer in the next couple of years.
"There is no way this would be competitive on day one," Bakken said. "Incentives will be important in the beginning."
NEWS: How Much Fossil Fuel is in the Earth?
Lerat says oil prices will need to be somewhere around $300 a barrel before it's economical, but he and others say extracting higher value chemicals first could change the equation.
"The more valuable things you can get out, the better," Adams said.
Indeed, the idea of the "biorefinery," analogous to the petrochemical refinery where high-value petrochemicals are taken out of crude oil before fuel is refined, is a popular vision of the future for terrestrial and marine biofuels alike.
Components of bioplastics, nutritional supplements, protein for fish food or even the phosphorus-laden ash from seaweed could be possible profit-turners. The remaining, carbohydrate-rich biomass could be fermented or digested to ethanol and methane for fuel. Bakken notes that the available area for cultivation could be "almost unlimited and believes seaweed can make "a very large contribution" to the liquid fuels industry. His company claims that about 3.7 metric tons of kelp are needed to produce a barrel of ethanol.
Current global production is about 15 million metric tons, largely for alginate and food, and mostly in China and Japan. In a release from last year, Bakken's company reported that using 0.05 percent of Europe's coastal areas to cultivate kelp could supply 4.7 percent of the 2008 global ethanol production.
For now, the crop would be seasonal. Adams presented work this week at a meeting of the Society for Experimental Biology in Glasgow, Scotland, noting that carbohydrate levels in kelp on the Welsh coast rise tenfold from their wintertime lows to 35 to 40 percent in July, a finding that others have agreed with.
Seaweed crops would likely be bred for desirable attributes over time, including a longer cultivation season. Prudence would be needed in what species were introduced where, researchers agreed, to avoid problems with species invasions.
"I think this is really big," Bakken said. "It's not only the seaweed. It's the shift toward thinking 'blue.' We are so land-based. I think this will open up all kinds of industries related to the sea. It's finally beginning now."
http://news.discovery.com/autos/seaweed-kelp-fuel-cars-crops-110711.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DiscoveryNews-Autos-News+%28Discovery+News+-+Autos+News%29#mkcpgn=rssnws1
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Another spill in a beautiful neighborhood
This is unbelievable! With all these corporate henchmen winding up in congress and pushing forward deregulation and agendas to increase profits at the expense of our natural resources and homes, you'd expect to see a riot. Where are the pissed off folks at??????
Another oil spill, this time in Montana in the middle of the country. You know this oil is going to spread down the Yellowstone River into countless other regions creating many problems and destroying wildlife for years to come.
We here at CP have said it before and will say it again, oil is not a resource we should invest in any longer. We need new forms of fuel, many of which are already in the works and are sustainable and environmentally friendly. What i suggest doing is hitting Exxon where it hurts the most ... their pockets. Don't buy their gas. Go to one of the lesser of many evils like 76. I've stopped going to Shell, BP and Chevron due to all the debacles and carelesness that they've been creating.
Read the article below and just try to imagine waking up to some shit like that. And pardon the French, but sometimes you just have to let the steam out.

The spread of an estimated 1,000 barrels or 42,000 gallons of crude oil along the flooded banks of the Yellowstone River in Montana is becoming increasingly difficult to capture since an ExxonMobile pipeline ruptured late Friday night.
The break in the pipe near Laurel, Mont., forced an immediate evacuation of about 140 people from the town to protect them from possible explosions and dangerous fumes.
Brent Peters, the fire chief for Laurel, told the Associated Press that once the leak was detected he asked the three oil companies with pipelines in the area to shut down their flows. The residents were allowed to return to their homes around 4 a.m. on Saturday. ExxonMobile reports that pipeline pumps were shut down seven minutes after the loss of pressure in the system.
While the fumes have dissipated to safer levels, the smell of the oil still permeates the air downstream and 12 miles to the east through the city of Billings, where the oil pipeline terminates. ExxonMobile, Cenex Harvest Refinery and Conoco Phillips all have refineries in Billings. The 12-inch diameter ExxonMobile pipe that ruptured was buried six feet below the riverbed and carrying crude oil from Belfry, Mont.
ExxonMobile clean-up crews from the Billings refinery laid out absorbent material and booms along the banks and across the Yellowstone River on Saturday, but the fast flows and flooding has hampered efforts to contain the spread. ExxonMobile sent a team of 50 more oil spill responders to the area on Sunday.
The Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, and the International Bird Rescue as well as local and state authorities are also on the scene.
The Associate Press reported that oil from the slick had reached Hysham, Mont., by late Saturday night, a distance of nearly 100 miles east of Laurel.
"Nobody's been able to lay their eyes on the pipe," Peters told the AP. "Right now, the Yellowstone River is at flood stage. The bank isn't stable enough for anybody to get close.
Oil spills into Montana's Yellowstone River
Another oil spill, this time in Montana in the middle of the country. You know this oil is going to spread down the Yellowstone River into countless other regions creating many problems and destroying wildlife for years to come.
We here at CP have said it before and will say it again, oil is not a resource we should invest in any longer. We need new forms of fuel, many of which are already in the works and are sustainable and environmentally friendly. What i suggest doing is hitting Exxon where it hurts the most ... their pockets. Don't buy their gas. Go to one of the lesser of many evils like 76. I've stopped going to Shell, BP and Chevron due to all the debacles and carelesness that they've been creating.
Read the article below and just try to imagine waking up to some shit like that. And pardon the French, but sometimes you just have to let the steam out.
The spread of an estimated 1,000 barrels or 42,000 gallons of crude oil along the flooded banks of the Yellowstone River in Montana is becoming increasingly difficult to capture since an ExxonMobile pipeline ruptured late Friday night.
The break in the pipe near Laurel, Mont., forced an immediate evacuation of about 140 people from the town to protect them from possible explosions and dangerous fumes.
Brent Peters, the fire chief for Laurel, told the Associated Press that once the leak was detected he asked the three oil companies with pipelines in the area to shut down their flows. The residents were allowed to return to their homes around 4 a.m. on Saturday. ExxonMobile reports that pipeline pumps were shut down seven minutes after the loss of pressure in the system.
While the fumes have dissipated to safer levels, the smell of the oil still permeates the air downstream and 12 miles to the east through the city of Billings, where the oil pipeline terminates. ExxonMobile, Cenex Harvest Refinery and Conoco Phillips all have refineries in Billings. The 12-inch diameter ExxonMobile pipe that ruptured was buried six feet below the riverbed and carrying crude oil from Belfry, Mont.
ExxonMobile clean-up crews from the Billings refinery laid out absorbent material and booms along the banks and across the Yellowstone River on Saturday, but the fast flows and flooding has hampered efforts to contain the spread. ExxonMobile sent a team of 50 more oil spill responders to the area on Sunday.
The Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, and the International Bird Rescue as well as local and state authorities are also on the scene.
The Associate Press reported that oil from the slick had reached Hysham, Mont., by late Saturday night, a distance of nearly 100 miles east of Laurel.
"Nobody's been able to lay their eyes on the pipe," Peters told the AP. "Right now, the Yellowstone River is at flood stage. The bank isn't stable enough for anybody to get close.
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Plastics: An enemy of the ocean state
We here at Coastal Playground pride ourselves in being able to take part in making sure our oceans are clean and safe. Heck, we enjoy the beach just as much as the next guy and seeing trash littered and mixed in the sand is an awful site. Its like trashing a zen garden. Who does that? Well, many Americans do. And one of the leading pollutants in and around our beaches is plastic.
With the new green movement that appears to be happening across the nation, you are starting to see many companies focusing on promoting environmentally friendly and sustainable products. But as is normal nowadays with corporations that are only out to make big bucks, a lot of the marketing can be very misleading.
Below is an article I found which helps explain the differences between the types of recycling that can occur with the many different types of plastics we have. Some even claiming to be environmentally friendly, when in fact, they are not.
It's a good read and I encourage everyone to read. The first line of defense in keeping the oceans clean and safe is by recycling at home. And we're glad to be bringing this attention to our readers so spread the word to friends and family to keep the movement going. Nothing but positive benefits can come from this, for us and the environment.

http://www.alternet.org/environment/151543/compostable_or_recyclable_why_bioplastics_are_causing_an_environmental_headache
With the new green movement that appears to be happening across the nation, you are starting to see many companies focusing on promoting environmentally friendly and sustainable products. But as is normal nowadays with corporations that are only out to make big bucks, a lot of the marketing can be very misleading.
Below is an article I found which helps explain the differences between the types of recycling that can occur with the many different types of plastics we have. Some even claiming to be environmentally friendly, when in fact, they are not.
It's a good read and I encourage everyone to read. The first line of defense in keeping the oceans clean and safe is by recycling at home. And we're glad to be bringing this attention to our readers so spread the word to friends and family to keep the movement going. Nothing but positive benefits can come from this, for us and the environment.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/151543/compostable_or_recyclable_why_bioplastics_are_causing_an_environmental_headache
Friday, July 1, 2011
Summer's just around the corner ... but don't jump in the water just yet.
Happy Friday, Happy 1st of the month and in a few days, Happy Independence day.
And what better way to spend this hot weekend than at the beach!!
But then I came across this interesting article from MSN in regards to the quality of the water in and around the nations beaches. The most important thing to consider at all times is the health and well being of our communities and that is what Coastal Playground is all about! Keeping the beaches clean and safe not only for us but for all the creatures that share the same environments.
We will be holding multiple beach clean ups throughout the summer so keep an eye out for the dates. And remember to visit our store, where every purchase you make, 50% of that goes to fund beach clean ups!

http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/27/6958891-report-highlights-poor-water-quality-at-nations-beaches
And what better way to spend this hot weekend than at the beach!!
But then I came across this interesting article from MSN in regards to the quality of the water in and around the nations beaches. The most important thing to consider at all times is the health and well being of our communities and that is what Coastal Playground is all about! Keeping the beaches clean and safe not only for us but for all the creatures that share the same environments.
We will be holding multiple beach clean ups throughout the summer so keep an eye out for the dates. And remember to visit our store, where every purchase you make, 50% of that goes to fund beach clean ups!
http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/27/6958891-report-highlights-poor-water-quality-at-nations-beaches
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Hello everyone and happy hump day!
We have a little Take Action request from the great SurfRider non-profit organization. This one is asking for petitions to make sure the EPA is enforcing the requirement of the best technology being used by these companies to not harm the oceans. Visit the link below to get signed up and add on to our voice.
This is what Coastal Playground is all about, keeping beaches clean and safe for our future generations.

Every day, across the US, older power plants suck in and kill ocean life and disrupt the delicate ecological balance of our coastal and ocean environment through a process commonly called “once-through cooling.” This process is outdated and these older power plants can retrofit with newer technology that re-circulates the water necessary to cool the generators. Re-circulating cooling systems are commonplace on newer power plants and should be standard equipment on every power plant in the country.
The Clean Water Act mandates that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) require all power plants in the country use the “best technology available” to avoid killing ocean life. For years, EPA failed to draft rules to enforce the protection of our precious marine life until the environmental community finally forced them to take action through several lawsuits. Unfortunately, the EPA is once again attempting to avoid their duty and is considering a new rule that leaves enforcement up to the states. THAT’S NOT RIGHT! In fact, that’s what EPA has been doing since the Clean Water Act was passed nearly 40 years ago. IT HASN’T WORKED BEFORE – AND IT WON’T WORK NOW!!
Please join Surfrider Foundation and numerous other organizations in telling EPA to fully enforce the Clean Water Act by telling the electric generating industry to update their antiquated power plants with technology that re-circulates cooling water and eliminates the unnecessary death of our precious marine life.
Nearly forty years of avoiding their duty is over. It’s well past time for EPA to enforce the laws that protect our wonderful and precious marine wildlife!
http://action.surfrider.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4401
We have a little Take Action request from the great SurfRider non-profit organization. This one is asking for petitions to make sure the EPA is enforcing the requirement of the best technology being used by these companies to not harm the oceans. Visit the link below to get signed up and add on to our voice.
This is what Coastal Playground is all about, keeping beaches clean and safe for our future generations.
Every day, across the US, older power plants suck in and kill ocean life and disrupt the delicate ecological balance of our coastal and ocean environment through a process commonly called “once-through cooling.” This process is outdated and these older power plants can retrofit with newer technology that re-circulates the water necessary to cool the generators. Re-circulating cooling systems are commonplace on newer power plants and should be standard equipment on every power plant in the country.
The Clean Water Act mandates that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) require all power plants in the country use the “best technology available” to avoid killing ocean life. For years, EPA failed to draft rules to enforce the protection of our precious marine life until the environmental community finally forced them to take action through several lawsuits. Unfortunately, the EPA is once again attempting to avoid their duty and is considering a new rule that leaves enforcement up to the states. THAT’S NOT RIGHT! In fact, that’s what EPA has been doing since the Clean Water Act was passed nearly 40 years ago. IT HASN’T WORKED BEFORE – AND IT WON’T WORK NOW!!
Please join Surfrider Foundation and numerous other organizations in telling EPA to fully enforce the Clean Water Act by telling the electric generating industry to update their antiquated power plants with technology that re-circulates cooling water and eliminates the unnecessary death of our precious marine life.
Nearly forty years of avoiding their duty is over. It’s well past time for EPA to enforce the laws that protect our wonderful and precious marine wildlife!
http://action.surfrider.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4401
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
What level of importance is environmentalism in your house?
For the last few months, I've been giving it a jab to make myself as sustainable and environmentally friendly as one can in a 1 bedroom 1 bath apartment in Tustin. Granted that i don't even own the actual structure, I can't really make much modification, or else I would have tried installing some solar panels already.
Well, it seems that the White House doesn't really take environmentalism as much of a priority. Below is an article I came across in regards to the Obama Administrations appeasements on its eco policy. Check out the article for yourself and comment back here on the different things you do to help the Earth :)
Well, it seems that the White House doesn't really take environmentalism as much of a priority. Below is an article I came across in regards to the Obama Administrations appeasements on its eco policy. Check out the article for yourself and comment back here on the different things you do to help the Earth :)
Mr. Babbitt’s Protest
Former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt declared in a speech last week that President Obama’s failure to mount a persuasive counterattack to the Republicans’ “radical” assault on the country’s environmental safeguards amounts to a “form of appeasement.”
It is rare for someone of Mr. Babbitt’s stature to use such caustic language about a sitting president from his own party. But he was reflecting growing concern — which we share — that the president and his top aides have decided for political reasons to back away from the fight. In recent months the White House has been far too quiet on the problem of climate change, and its once-promising efforts to regulate industrial pollution, toxic coal ash and mountaintop mining are flagging.
Mr. Babbitt’s main complaint involved Mr. Obama’s failure to do more to conserve open space and protect sensitive areas threatened by imminent development. He was particularly dismayed by the White House’s acceptance of a Republican budget rider — pushed by the oil and gas industry — undercutting the Interior Department’s authority to identify and set aside valuable public lands for future designation as permanent wilderness.
Mr. Babbitt said Mr. Obama still represented “the best, and likely only, hope for meaningful progress” on energy and the environment, and we must hope, as he does, that the president’s temporizing is merely temporary. Even bigger fights lie ahead. The administration has proposed to limit power plant emissions of toxic pollutants like mercury and impose new rules governing power plant emissions of greenhouse gases. Any retreat from these pledges would be disastrous.
Mr. Babbitt also said President Obama should emulate President Bill Clinton, Mr. Babbitt’s old boss, who faced similar opposition after the 1994 Republican revolution but came roaring back. After wavering for a while, he seized the lead on conservation issues and threatened to veto all anti-environmental legislation. The public supported him; the Republicans retreated. It is sound advice.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/13/opinion/13mon3.html?_r=1
Mr. Babbitt said Mr. Obama still represented “the best, and likely only, hope for meaningful progress” on energy and the environment, and we must hope, as he does, that the president’s temporizing is merely temporary. Even bigger fights lie ahead. The administration has proposed to limit power plant emissions of toxic pollutants like mercury and impose new rules governing power plant emissions of greenhouse gases. Any retreat from these pledges would be disastrous.
Mr. Babbitt also said President Obama should emulate President Bill Clinton, Mr. Babbitt’s old boss, who faced similar opposition after the 1994 Republican revolution but came roaring back. After wavering for a while, he seized the lead on conservation issues and threatened to veto all anti-environmental legislation. The public supported him; the Republicans retreated. It is sound advice.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/13/opinion/13mon3.html?_r=1
Report: If We Don't Stop Destroying Our Oceans, We'll See "Mass Extinction" of Marine Life
Pollution and global warming are pushing the world's oceans to the brink of a mass extinction of marine life unseen for tens of millions of years, a consortium of scientists warned Monday.
Dying coral reefs, biodiversity ravaged by invasive species, expanding open-water "dead zones," toxic algae blooms, the massive depletion of big fish stocks -- all are accelerating, they said in a report compiled during an April meeting in Oxford of 27 of the world's top ocean experts.
Sponsored by the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO), the review of recent science found that ocean health has declined further and faster than dire forecasts only a few years ago.
These symptoms, moreover, could be the harbinger of wider disruptions in the interlocking web of biological and chemical interactions that scientists now call the Earth system.
Monday, June 20, 2011
A love for beer and a love for surf? And environmentalism!
Check out this video on a surfboard made out of empty beer cans!
Cote’s Cube: The Recycled Beer Can Surfboard
Cote’s Cube: The Recycled Beer Can Surfboard
Rich Morrison and TWS' Chris Coté and the recycled beer can surfboard. Photo: Kueny
Friday, June 17, 2011
Oh no, not the wetlands!
So as I've been pointing out all this talk on how the highlands and other ecosystems affect the oceans, here we have an article that is chronicling the loss of wetlands in Louisiana. One thing that the wetlands provide assistance in keeping the oceans healthy is by absorbing and preventing farm nutrients, waste and other run offs from reaching the coasts.
One of many more reasons coming up on why we should be moving to a more sustainable and eco-friendly society.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
The Evolution of the Wetsuit
Good day CP Family!
For those bodyboarders and surfers out there, the greatest thing to come around since sliced bread has to be the wetsuit. It's total beach fasion and signature style, keeping you nice and comfy against cold, salty waters. Well, now, it looks like Billabong has upped the ante by creating a wet suit with a built in flotation device. Really RAD (shout out to you Adrian) stuff here. Check out the video below and if you got the funds, go cop one for yourself. Now you can really enjoy some extreme surf! Just remember to pull that string!
http://www.surfline.com/video/events-and-promotions/the-wetsuit-that-will-forever-change-big-wave-surfing_56388
For those bodyboarders and surfers out there, the greatest thing to come around since sliced bread has to be the wetsuit. It's total beach fasion and signature style, keeping you nice and comfy against cold, salty waters. Well, now, it looks like Billabong has upped the ante by creating a wet suit with a built in flotation device. Really RAD (shout out to you Adrian) stuff here. Check out the video below and if you got the funds, go cop one for yourself. Now you can really enjoy some extreme surf! Just remember to pull that string!
http://www.surfline.com/video/events-and-promotions/the-wetsuit-that-will-forever-change-big-wave-surfing_56388
THE BAG MONSTER!!!
http://www.bagmonster.com/
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
The Tragic Effects occuring in the Gulf Coast
Not only are the Gulf Coast residents still trying to restore their habitats, well being and jobs due to the aftermath of the oil spills that occured last year, they also have the huge effects of the farming that occurs in the midwest. This article details those issues and how we sitll have a long way to go in creating a sustainability that does not affect our oceans. This also points out to how all the ecosystems are tied in to one another and that the highlands need to be protected just as much as the coasts.

A dead zone -- already the size of the state of New Jersey -- is growing in the Gulf of Mexico, fueled by nutrient runoff from the swollen Mississippi River.
This year, with floodwaters from the Birds Point levee breach and the Morganza and Bonnet Carret spillways spreading over farmland and other residential areas, the river is collecting tremendous amounts of fertilizer and pesticides. This is contributing to what scientists say may become the largest dead zone ever, and posing a serious threat to already taxed marine life.
During the rainy season, fertilizer, animal waste, sewage and car exhaust wash into the Mississippi and the Atchafalaya rivers, flow south and empty into the mouth of the Gulf.
Nitrogen and phosphorous from farm runoff and animal waste are especially toxic to ocean life. They act as natural fertilizers, feeding harmful algae and causing it to bloom wildly. As bacteria consume these blooms, they suck oxygen from the water, depleting the ocean's oxygen reserves. Scientists call this oxygen depletion hypoxia.
"We're expecting probably the largest-ever amount of hypoxia," said Nancy Rabalais, a marine scientist and executive director of the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium. "That's the the prediction based on the amount of nitrogen coming down the river."
A surge of fresh water creates a layering effect in the seawater, which compounds the problem. The freshwater sits above the heavier saltwater, acting as a cap that prevents oxygen from reaching the deeper water levels.
"The bottom layer of the ocean gets so low in oxygen that sea life has to swim away and vacate the area, and if they can't get away, they suffocate," said Matt Rota, science and water policy director for the Gulf Restoration Network.
Flooding could cause further injury to fisheries in the northern Gulf of Mexico, already reeling from last year's oil spill, Rabalais said. Dead zones alter the habitat for crab, shrimp, fish and lobster, often forcing them to shallow areas. This includes catchable seafood, like shrimp and snapper, which are vital to the area's fisheries.
"A lot of the Louisiana shrimp fisheries use smaller vessels," Rabalais said. "With the price of fuel and the distance they have to go, they might opt not to go offshore."
Possibly the largest source of nutrients comes from farms in Illinois, Iowa, Ohio and southwest Minnesota, where drainage tiles -- plastic pipes that crisscross underground - - drain the once-wet soil, making it arable, and dry enough for corn and soybean crops. But these pipes also flush nitrogen fertilizer into tributaries, which lead to rivers and eventually the Gulf.
In fact, research shows that the most heavily tile-drained areas of North America also contribute the largest source of nitrates to the Gulf of Mexico, which add to the dead zone, according to Mark David, a professor of biogeochemistry from the University of Illinois.
David is researching options for reducing nitrate levels. They include valves and beds of woodchips inside the tiles, as well as restoring wetlands, which filter pollution naturally.
It's not the farmers' fault, David said, but there's little incentive for farmers to reduce their nitrate output. "There's a fundamental problem in the whole system if we really want to reduce nitrate and phosphorous loss from the system. Everything's been voluntary up to this point, and that hasn't gotten us anywhere."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/05/the-gulf-of-mexico-has.html
Story by Jenny Marder
A dead zone -- already the size of the state of New Jersey -- is growing in the Gulf of Mexico, fueled by nutrient runoff from the swollen Mississippi River.
This year, with floodwaters from the Birds Point levee breach and the Morganza and Bonnet Carret spillways spreading over farmland and other residential areas, the river is collecting tremendous amounts of fertilizer and pesticides. This is contributing to what scientists say may become the largest dead zone ever, and posing a serious threat to already taxed marine life.
During the rainy season, fertilizer, animal waste, sewage and car exhaust wash into the Mississippi and the Atchafalaya rivers, flow south and empty into the mouth of the Gulf.
Nitrogen and phosphorous from farm runoff and animal waste are especially toxic to ocean life. They act as natural fertilizers, feeding harmful algae and causing it to bloom wildly. As bacteria consume these blooms, they suck oxygen from the water, depleting the ocean's oxygen reserves. Scientists call this oxygen depletion hypoxia.
"We're expecting probably the largest-ever amount of hypoxia," said Nancy Rabalais, a marine scientist and executive director of the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium. "That's the the prediction based on the amount of nitrogen coming down the river."
A surge of fresh water creates a layering effect in the seawater, which compounds the problem. The freshwater sits above the heavier saltwater, acting as a cap that prevents oxygen from reaching the deeper water levels.
"The bottom layer of the ocean gets so low in oxygen that sea life has to swim away and vacate the area, and if they can't get away, they suffocate," said Matt Rota, science and water policy director for the Gulf Restoration Network.
Flooding could cause further injury to fisheries in the northern Gulf of Mexico, already reeling from last year's oil spill, Rabalais said. Dead zones alter the habitat for crab, shrimp, fish and lobster, often forcing them to shallow areas. This includes catchable seafood, like shrimp and snapper, which are vital to the area's fisheries.
"A lot of the Louisiana shrimp fisheries use smaller vessels," Rabalais said. "With the price of fuel and the distance they have to go, they might opt not to go offshore."
Possibly the largest source of nutrients comes from farms in Illinois, Iowa, Ohio and southwest Minnesota, where drainage tiles -- plastic pipes that crisscross underground - - drain the once-wet soil, making it arable, and dry enough for corn and soybean crops. But these pipes also flush nitrogen fertilizer into tributaries, which lead to rivers and eventually the Gulf.
In fact, research shows that the most heavily tile-drained areas of North America also contribute the largest source of nitrates to the Gulf of Mexico, which add to the dead zone, according to Mark David, a professor of biogeochemistry from the University of Illinois.
David is researching options for reducing nitrate levels. They include valves and beds of woodchips inside the tiles, as well as restoring wetlands, which filter pollution naturally.
It's not the farmers' fault, David said, but there's little incentive for farmers to reduce their nitrate output. "There's a fundamental problem in the whole system if we really want to reduce nitrate and phosphorous loss from the system. Everything's been voluntary up to this point, and that hasn't gotten us anywhere."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/05/the-gulf-of-mexico-has.html
Story by Jenny Marder
Monday, June 13, 2011
Defending Sea Turtles and the Beach!
This is one of the reasons we must move away from Oil. Already there is an abundance of alternative fuels and ways of processing the items that we need for our daily lives. Let's take action and protect the sea creatures and keep our beaches safe!
Last year's devastating Deepwater Horizon disaster was a serious blow for sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico. But the catastrophe for the sea turtles hasn’t ended yet.
Already this year, more than 340 dead sea turtles have washed ashore on the Gulf Coast -- more than three times the annual average -- and the death toll is likely to be much higher. Signs point to shrimp fishing as a likely cause for the spike in deaths -- perhaps combined with the lingering effects of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
Yet the government has not taken action to save these animals struggling to survive. Defenders and our conservation partners have launched a lifesaving lawsuit to protect sea turtles, but federal officials need to hear from you.
Take action now: Urge the National Marine Fisheries Service to enforce lifesaving protections for threatened and endangered sea turtles in the Gulf.
Double Trouble for Sea Turtles
Last year's devastating Deepwater Horizon disaster was a serious blow for sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico. But the catastrophe for the sea turtles hasn’t ended yet.Already this year, more than 340 dead sea turtles have washed ashore on the Gulf Coast -- more than three times the annual average -- and the death toll is likely to be much higher. Signs point to shrimp fishing as a likely cause for the spike in deaths -- perhaps combined with the lingering effects of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
Yet the government has not taken action to save these animals struggling to survive. Defenders and our conservation partners have launched a lifesaving lawsuit to protect sea turtles, but federal officials need to hear from you.
Take action now: Urge the National Marine Fisheries Service to enforce lifesaving protections for threatened and endangered sea turtles in the Gulf.
Monday, June 6, 2011
Last Day to Speak out Loud!
This is a huge issue that needs to be addressed so we're hoping everyone has gone on and clicked to help voice their opinions that fossil fuels are a step back towards sustainability. If you haven't already done so, scroll down and click the petition. Let's hope Hillary Clinton doesn't sell out on this one.
The United States may be about to let oil giant TransCanada build 1,702 miles of pipeline -- they call it “Keystone XL” -- to funnel highly toxic tar sands from Alberta, Canada, all the way to refineries in Texas and Louisiana.
The only person standing between TransCanada and its plan to corrupt the American Midwest and vulnerable Gulf Coast in the name of oil profits is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who can either approve or deny the Presidential Permit needed to cross the US-Canada border.
Keystone XL would endanger pristine areas of Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and Louisiana -- as well as the Ogallala Aquifer, the largest source of water for drinking and crop irrigation in the country.
TransCanada claims the pipeline will be safe, but they said that last time, too.
When TransCanada was hammering through approval for their first pipeline, they swore the pipeline would only leak “every seven to eleven years” -- but its pumping stations have had 12 spills in just the last year. Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Transportation had to order TransCanada to shut down the pipeline because of ongoing safety concerns.
Right now, oil companies are pulling out all the stops to urge Secretary Clinton to permit this disastrous new tar sands pipeline.
Fight back against TransCanada and protect American health and safety. Public opposition is the only way to convince Secretary Clinton to stop the pipeline, so please sign the Sierra Club’s Change.org petition today:
Thanks for taking action,
- Patrick and the Change.org team
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
One thing leads to another ...
This article does a good job of explaining some scientific background and understanding on the delicate balance of the oceans and many habitats that exist on this great earth. Its a long read but definitely worth it.
The infernal origins of Vulcano Island are easy to pinpoint. Step off the hydrofoil from Sicily and the rotten-egg smell of hydrogen sulphide strikes you immediately. Beside the quay, there are piles of yellow sulphurous rocks and chunks of pumice; the beach is made of thick, black volcanic sand; while the huge caldera that dominates the bay emits a constant stream of smoke and steam.
According to legend, this was the lair of the Roman god of fire, Vulcan, who gave his name to the island and subsequently to all other volcanoes. An early eruption here also provided history with one of the first recorded descriptions of a volcano in action.
But Vulcano's importance today has nothing to do with the rock and lava it has spewed out for millennia. It is the volcano's output of invisible carbon dioxide – about 10 tonnes a day – that now interests scientists. They have found that the gas is bubbling through underground vents and is making the island's coastal waters more and more acidic. The consequences for sea life are grim with dozens of species having been eliminated.
That discovery is highly revealing, and worrying, because Vulcano's afflictions are being repeated today on a global scale, in every ocean on the planet – not from volcanic sources but from the industrial plants, power stations, cars and planes that are pumping out growing amounts of carbon dioxide and which are making our seas increasingly acidic. Millions of marine species are now threatened with extinction; fisheries face eradication; while reefs that protect coastal areas are starting to erode.
Ocean acidification is now one of the most worrying threats to the planet, say marine biologists. "Just as Vulcano is pumping carbon dioxide into the waters around it, humanity is pouring more and more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere," Dr Jason Hall-Spencer, a marine biologist at Plymouth University, told a conference on the island last week.
"Some of the billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide we emit each year lingers in the atmosphere and causes it to heat up, driving global warming. But about 30% of that gas is absorbed by the oceans where it turns to carbonic acid. It is beginning to kill off coral reefs and shellfish beds and threaten stocks of fish. Very little can live in water that gets too acidic."
Hence science's renewed interest in Vulcano. Its carbon dioxide springs – which bubble up like burst water mains below the shallow seabed – provide researchers with a natural laboratory for testing the global impact of ocean acidification. "These vents and the carbonic acid they generate tell us a great deal about how carbon dioxide is going to affect the oceans and marine life this century," said Hall-Spencer. "And we should be worried. This problem is a train coming straight at us."
Scientists estimate that oceans absorb around a million tonnes of carbon dioxide every hour and our seas are 30% more acidic than they were last century. This increased acidity plays havoc with levels of calcium carbonate, which forms the shells and skeletons of many sea creatures, and also disrupts reproductive activity.
Among the warning signs recently noted have been the failures of commercial oyster and other shellfish beds on the Pacific coasts of the US and Canada. In addition, coral reefs – already bleached by rising global temperatures – have suffered calamitous disintegration in many regions. And at the poles and high latitudes, where the impact of ocean acidification is particularly serious, tiny shellfish called pteropods – the basic foodstuff of fish, whales and seabirds in those regions – have suffered noticeable drops in numbers. In each case, ocean acidification is thought to be involved.
The problem was recently highlighted by the head of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Dr Jane Lubchenco. She described ocean acidification as global warming's "equally evil twin". It is a powerful comparison, though it is clear that of the two, the crisis facing our seas has received far less attention. The last UN climate assessment report was more than 400 pages long but had only two pages on ocean acidification – mainly because studies of the phenomenon are less well advanced than meteorological and atmospheric research in general.
The workshop, held last week on Vulcano, is part of the campaign to understand the likely impact of ocean acidification. Dozens of young oceanographers, geologists and ecologists gathered for the meeting run by the Mediterranean Sea Acidification (MedSeA) programme. Dr Maoz Fine, of Bar-Ilan University in Israel, reported work on coral reef organisms that had been exposed to waters of different levels of acidity, temperature and light in his laboratory.
"We found that species of coral reef respond differently to rising carbon dioxide levels," he said. "Bigger corals suffer but survive while smaller, branching varieties become less able to fight disease and die off. That sort of thing just makes it even more difficult to predict exactly what is going to happen to our oceans."
Few scientists doubt that the impact on reefs will be anything short of devastating, however. The Caribbean has already lost about 80% of its coral reefs to bleaching caused by rising temperatures and by overfishing which removes species that normally aid coral growth. Acidification threatens to do the same for the rest of the world's coral reefs.
"By the middle of the century there will probably be only a few pockets – in the North Sea and the Pacific. Millions of species of fish, shellfish and micro-organisms will be wiped out," said Fine.
Acidification has affected the oceans in the past. However, these prehistoric events occurred at a far slower rate, said Dr Jerry Blackford of Plymouth Marine Laboratory. "The waters of the world take around 500 years to circulate the globe," he said. "If carbon dioxide was rising slowly, in terms of thousands of years, natural factors could then compensate. Sediments could buffer the carbonic acid, for example."
But levels of carbon dioxide are rising much faster today. By the end of the century, surface seawater will be 150% more acidic than it was in 1800. "There is simply not enough time for buffering to come into effect and lessen the impact," said Blackford. "The result will be significant acid build-up in the upper parts of the oceans which, of course, are the parts that are of greatest importance to humans."
A vision of the seas we are now creating can be seen at Vulcano. On the eastern side of its main bay, beyond an open-air thermal spa filled with elderly bathers wallowing in volcanically heated mud, there is a long stretch of black sand.
Just offshore, in about four feet of water, silver beads of carbon dioxide stream up from stones that lie over an underground vent. The water, although cold, looks like a huge, frothing Jacuzzi. Water here is highly acidic and there is no marine life around the vent – not even seaweed.
"The acidity here is far greater than even the worst ocean scenario for 2100, so we have to be careful about making comparisons," said Dr Marco Milazzo, of Palermo University. "However, currents carry that acid water round the bay and it becomes more and more dilute. We can then study waters which reflect the kind of acidity we are likely to get at the end of the century."
Milazzo and his colleagues have placed open boxes containing coral and other forms of marine life in the waters round the bay and monitor the effects of the different levels of acidity in the sea water on these samples and also on the bay's natural marine life. "When I look one way, out to sea, where there is little acidity, the plant life is rich in reds, whites, greens and other colours. There is abundance and variety in the habitat," said Milazzo.
"However, when I look the other way – back towards the carbon dioxide vent – that habitat gets less and less varied as the water gets more acidic. It is reduced to a dark brown bloom of macro-algae. There is no richness or variety here. In effect I am looking at the oceans of tomorrow. It is profoundly depressing."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/may/29/global-warming-threat-to-oceans
The infernal origins of Vulcano Island are easy to pinpoint. Step off the hydrofoil from Sicily and the rotten-egg smell of hydrogen sulphide strikes you immediately. Beside the quay, there are piles of yellow sulphurous rocks and chunks of pumice; the beach is made of thick, black volcanic sand; while the huge caldera that dominates the bay emits a constant stream of smoke and steam.
According to legend, this was the lair of the Roman god of fire, Vulcan, who gave his name to the island and subsequently to all other volcanoes. An early eruption here also provided history with one of the first recorded descriptions of a volcano in action.
But Vulcano's importance today has nothing to do with the rock and lava it has spewed out for millennia. It is the volcano's output of invisible carbon dioxide – about 10 tonnes a day – that now interests scientists. They have found that the gas is bubbling through underground vents and is making the island's coastal waters more and more acidic. The consequences for sea life are grim with dozens of species having been eliminated.
That discovery is highly revealing, and worrying, because Vulcano's afflictions are being repeated today on a global scale, in every ocean on the planet – not from volcanic sources but from the industrial plants, power stations, cars and planes that are pumping out growing amounts of carbon dioxide and which are making our seas increasingly acidic. Millions of marine species are now threatened with extinction; fisheries face eradication; while reefs that protect coastal areas are starting to erode.
Ocean acidification is now one of the most worrying threats to the planet, say marine biologists. "Just as Vulcano is pumping carbon dioxide into the waters around it, humanity is pouring more and more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere," Dr Jason Hall-Spencer, a marine biologist at Plymouth University, told a conference on the island last week.
"Some of the billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide we emit each year lingers in the atmosphere and causes it to heat up, driving global warming. But about 30% of that gas is absorbed by the oceans where it turns to carbonic acid. It is beginning to kill off coral reefs and shellfish beds and threaten stocks of fish. Very little can live in water that gets too acidic."
Hence science's renewed interest in Vulcano. Its carbon dioxide springs – which bubble up like burst water mains below the shallow seabed – provide researchers with a natural laboratory for testing the global impact of ocean acidification. "These vents and the carbonic acid they generate tell us a great deal about how carbon dioxide is going to affect the oceans and marine life this century," said Hall-Spencer. "And we should be worried. This problem is a train coming straight at us."
Scientists estimate that oceans absorb around a million tonnes of carbon dioxide every hour and our seas are 30% more acidic than they were last century. This increased acidity plays havoc with levels of calcium carbonate, which forms the shells and skeletons of many sea creatures, and also disrupts reproductive activity.
Among the warning signs recently noted have been the failures of commercial oyster and other shellfish beds on the Pacific coasts of the US and Canada. In addition, coral reefs – already bleached by rising global temperatures – have suffered calamitous disintegration in many regions. And at the poles and high latitudes, where the impact of ocean acidification is particularly serious, tiny shellfish called pteropods – the basic foodstuff of fish, whales and seabirds in those regions – have suffered noticeable drops in numbers. In each case, ocean acidification is thought to be involved.
The problem was recently highlighted by the head of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Dr Jane Lubchenco. She described ocean acidification as global warming's "equally evil twin". It is a powerful comparison, though it is clear that of the two, the crisis facing our seas has received far less attention. The last UN climate assessment report was more than 400 pages long but had only two pages on ocean acidification – mainly because studies of the phenomenon are less well advanced than meteorological and atmospheric research in general.
The workshop, held last week on Vulcano, is part of the campaign to understand the likely impact of ocean acidification. Dozens of young oceanographers, geologists and ecologists gathered for the meeting run by the Mediterranean Sea Acidification (MedSeA) programme. Dr Maoz Fine, of Bar-Ilan University in Israel, reported work on coral reef organisms that had been exposed to waters of different levels of acidity, temperature and light in his laboratory.
"We found that species of coral reef respond differently to rising carbon dioxide levels," he said. "Bigger corals suffer but survive while smaller, branching varieties become less able to fight disease and die off. That sort of thing just makes it even more difficult to predict exactly what is going to happen to our oceans."
Few scientists doubt that the impact on reefs will be anything short of devastating, however. The Caribbean has already lost about 80% of its coral reefs to bleaching caused by rising temperatures and by overfishing which removes species that normally aid coral growth. Acidification threatens to do the same for the rest of the world's coral reefs.
"By the middle of the century there will probably be only a few pockets – in the North Sea and the Pacific. Millions of species of fish, shellfish and micro-organisms will be wiped out," said Fine.
Acidification has affected the oceans in the past. However, these prehistoric events occurred at a far slower rate, said Dr Jerry Blackford of Plymouth Marine Laboratory. "The waters of the world take around 500 years to circulate the globe," he said. "If carbon dioxide was rising slowly, in terms of thousands of years, natural factors could then compensate. Sediments could buffer the carbonic acid, for example."
But levels of carbon dioxide are rising much faster today. By the end of the century, surface seawater will be 150% more acidic than it was in 1800. "There is simply not enough time for buffering to come into effect and lessen the impact," said Blackford. "The result will be significant acid build-up in the upper parts of the oceans which, of course, are the parts that are of greatest importance to humans."
A vision of the seas we are now creating can be seen at Vulcano. On the eastern side of its main bay, beyond an open-air thermal spa filled with elderly bathers wallowing in volcanically heated mud, there is a long stretch of black sand.
Just offshore, in about four feet of water, silver beads of carbon dioxide stream up from stones that lie over an underground vent. The water, although cold, looks like a huge, frothing Jacuzzi. Water here is highly acidic and there is no marine life around the vent – not even seaweed.
"The acidity here is far greater than even the worst ocean scenario for 2100, so we have to be careful about making comparisons," said Dr Marco Milazzo, of Palermo University. "However, currents carry that acid water round the bay and it becomes more and more dilute. We can then study waters which reflect the kind of acidity we are likely to get at the end of the century."
Milazzo and his colleagues have placed open boxes containing coral and other forms of marine life in the waters round the bay and monitor the effects of the different levels of acidity in the sea water on these samples and also on the bay's natural marine life. "When I look one way, out to sea, where there is little acidity, the plant life is rich in reds, whites, greens and other colours. There is abundance and variety in the habitat," said Milazzo.
"However, when I look the other way – back towards the carbon dioxide vent – that habitat gets less and less varied as the water gets more acidic. It is reduced to a dark brown bloom of macro-algae. There is no richness or variety here. In effect I am looking at the oceans of tomorrow. It is profoundly depressing."
DEEP WATER
Acidity is measured by its pH (power of hydrogen) value. Fresh water has a pH reading of 7. Readings below that are considered to be acidic. Those above 7 are alkaline. Surface sea water had a reading of 8.2 a century ago. Today it has dropped to 8.1 because so much carbon dioxide has been absorbed by the world's oceans. That may seem a small amount but the pH scale is logarithmic which means that 0.1 difference actually represents an increase in acidity of 30%. By the end of the century, the pH of surface sea water could have dropped to 7.8, which represents a decrease in alkalinity – or an increase in acidity, depending on your viewpoint – of around 150%.http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/may/29/global-warming-threat-to-oceans
Friday, May 27, 2011
No MORE Oil Drilling!!!
Via Brave New Foundation
Could there be a better opportunity to strike the Kochs where it hurts? Help us stop Koch Industries, Inc. from profiting off a pipeline that would carry the dirtiest oil on Earth through six states, one of America’s most important aquifers and almost 2,000 miles of American homes and farmland.
The Koch brothers stand to make millions off of this destructive act, and Congressional Republicans this week are trying to speed the project's approval. But Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has the ability to stop this. She alone has the power to approve or reject the pipeline.
Sign our petition and help us reach our goal of 50,000 individuals telling Secretary Clinton to say No to the Kochs and Yes to protecting Americans.
Tell Secretary Clinton to reject the Keystone Tar Sands pipeline.
Could there be a better opportunity to strike the Kochs where it hurts? Help us stop Koch Industries, Inc. from profiting off a pipeline that would carry the dirtiest oil on Earth through six states, one of America’s most important aquifers and almost 2,000 miles of American homes and farmland.
The Koch brothers stand to make millions off of this destructive act, and Congressional Republicans this week are trying to speed the project's approval. But Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has the ability to stop this. She alone has the power to approve or reject the pipeline.
Sign our petition and help us reach our goal of 50,000 individuals telling Secretary Clinton to say No to the Kochs and Yes to protecting Americans.
Tell Secretary Clinton to reject the Keystone Tar Sands pipeline.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Coast Keeper is looking for Volunteers and Sponsors!!!
Kids Ocean Day 2011: Coastkeeper seeks Volunteers and Sponsors! |
It's hard to believe that another Kids Ocean Day is right around the corner! This will be Coastkeeper's 4th year as the OC host of the statewide event- sponsored by the CA Coastal Commission as part of the Whale Tail License Plate Program. On June 7, over 800 kids from inland schools will visit Huntington Beach to be a part of Kids Ocean Day. Students will help clean to the beach, and then come together to make a giant message in the sand. In addition to a commited group of volunteers from Sam's Club, Coastkeeper is looking for more volunteers to make the event a success. We also need donations to cover a second bus for schools with larger groups. Click the links below to get involved! |
Monday, May 23, 2011
The government is increasing oil drilling ...
even after the disaster that was the BP oil explosion and spill. Money really does rule in the land of this here America. While people continue to suffer additional economic woes on top of the current crisis down in the gulf, the government keeps handing out contracts and is turning a blind eye on the negligence of oil companies. Its time we find new, re-usable and environmentally friendly resources.
Check out the link below and voice your opinion by signing the petition to have your senators vote against the bill.
http://action.surfrider.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4027
Check out the link below and voice your opinion by signing the petition to have your senators vote against the bill.
http://action.surfrider.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4027
Friday, May 20, 2011
Vision: Nature Needs Rights
Editor’s Note: The following is excerpted from the recently released book, The Rights of Nature: The case for a Universal Declaration on the rights of Mother Earth, produced by the Council of Canadians, Global Exchange and Fundacion Pachamama. This book reveals the path of a movement driving transformation of our human relationship with nature away from domination and towards balance. This book gathers the wisdom of indigenous cultures, scientists, activists small farmers, spiritual leaders and US communities who seek a different path for protecting nature by establishing Nature's Rights in law and culture. In addition to this excerpt, the book includes essays from Vandana Shiva, Desmond Tutu, Thomas Goldtooth, Eduardo Galeano, and many others. Copies of the book may be obtained through Global Exchange.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Looking for a different direction for politics and how to manage our current issues??
You might want to try attending the Party for Socialism and Liberation Conference being held in LA. They will be hosting guest speakers to talk about what changes can be made to the corrupted government we currently have. See you there!!
Featured speaker: Richard Becker, author, Palestine, Israel & the U.S. Empire (2009).
Find out what socialism is, what we aim for, and why socialism is the only answer to the misery created by capitalism. The conference will feature speakers, panels, organizing strategy sessions, entertainment, and discussion on topics related to the fight against capitalist exploitation, war, racism, and imperialism.

Whether you want to organize against war, racism, sexism and capitalist exploitation, or if you just want to learn what socialism is all about, the May 21 new Socialism Conference has something for you.
May 21 Socialism Conference in LA
All out to organize and fight back!
Video by John Hernandez
Published on May 16, 2011
Join us on Saturday, May 21 in Los Angeles for a Southern California Regional Socialism Conference hosted by ANSWER Coalition member group, the Party for Socialism and Liberation. It will take place from 11 am to 5 pm. Featured speaker: Richard Becker, author, Palestine, Israel & the U.S. Empire (2009).
Find out what socialism is, what we aim for, and why socialism is the only answer to the misery created by capitalism. The conference will feature speakers, panels, organizing strategy sessions, entertainment, and discussion on topics related to the fight against capitalist exploitation, war, racism, and imperialism.
Whether you want to organize against war, racism, sexism and capitalist exploitation, or if you just want to learn what socialism is all about, the May 21 new Socialism Conference has something for you.
- Register today and bring as many people as you can to this special conference.
- Click here to join the Facebook event page.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Its a sad time for hikers, campers and public park loving folks.
Come fall, Californians could find themselves with fewer parks to visit and fewer services available at parks that are open. Last week, California Governor Jerry Brown announced plans to close 70 of the Golden State's 278 state parks in an effort to balance the state budget. Although proposed closure lists have been released in the past in response to previous budget cut proposals, this is the first time in the 100 year history of California’s state park system that closures will be implemented.
While the plan is not yet finalized, State Parks Director Ruth Coleman hinted at the fact that in addition to park closures, there is a possibility of cutting back on services, such as closing bathrooms, lifeguard towers and other facilities, throughout the state park system, cutting $11 million in the coming fiscal year and $22 million in the 2012-13 fiscal year.
If you enjoy camping, hiking, surfing and California's outdoors, and want to help stop the closure of our state parks please click here to send a letter to your legislators and the Governor opposing these closures and showing your continued support for California’s state parks.
via Surfrider Newsletter
While the plan is not yet finalized, State Parks Director Ruth Coleman hinted at the fact that in addition to park closures, there is a possibility of cutting back on services, such as closing bathrooms, lifeguard towers and other facilities, throughout the state park system, cutting $11 million in the coming fiscal year and $22 million in the 2012-13 fiscal year.
If you enjoy camping, hiking, surfing and California's outdoors, and want to help stop the closure of our state parks please click here to send a letter to your legislators and the Governor opposing these closures and showing your continued support for California’s state parks.
via Surfrider Newsletter
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
The TCA is at it again!
Get your picket signs ready because we might have a battle in the horizon! The Transportation Corridors Agency is trying some new PR using the tragedy of Japan's nuclear meltdowns.
Horrible isn't it? And what is the PR stunt geared towards you say?? More ... high ... ways. And not public roads like the freeway from hell, the 91! No, they want to build more toll roads. That's right ladies and gentlemen, they want to charge us for more useless products as our income levels keep dropping like flies. This is in addition to the fact that they would be building the toll road along a state park, San Onofre to be exact.
Read the link below to get some details and start letting the imagination run wild on all those clever things we can come up with to undermine their little mind games.
http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2011/05/time_for_a_rematch_tca_rekindl.php
Monday, May 16, 2011
Who needs the careful application of the scientific method when congressmen with absolutely no scientific training are making decisions?
Say what??
With all the advancements we have achieved thanks to science (not to mention all the destructive things, but there is always a polarity, it just depends on how we use it) you would think that these tests and reports would be taken seriously by our government. That's not the case! We have 2 parties who have been switching control back and forth and both have no regards for the future of our home. Its a long read but definitely worth it, just to point out the negligence going on in the houses out in DC. More reason to voice your opinions. So take to the streets, spread the good word and watch your representatives with a hawks eye. If they don't give transparency we'll find a way on our own.

http://www.alternet.org/environment/150854/gop_assault_on_truth:_why_do_conservatives_pretend_they_know_more_about_science_than_scientists?page=entire
With all the advancements we have achieved thanks to science (not to mention all the destructive things, but there is always a polarity, it just depends on how we use it) you would think that these tests and reports would be taken seriously by our government. That's not the case! We have 2 parties who have been switching control back and forth and both have no regards for the future of our home. Its a long read but definitely worth it, just to point out the negligence going on in the houses out in DC. More reason to voice your opinions. So take to the streets, spread the good word and watch your representatives with a hawks eye. If they don't give transparency we'll find a way on our own.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/150854/gop_assault_on_truth:_why_do_conservatives_pretend_they_know_more_about_science_than_scientists?page=entire
Friday, May 13, 2011
Tell EPA to Clean Up Polluted Waters
As water flows over streets, parking lots, and other “hardscapes,” it picks up pollutants and carries them to our waterways. This “storm water” is a leading source of pollution to waterways throughout the country. In November 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an important Memorandum that encouraged states to set numeric limits in storm water permits, and to take other strong actions to address this pervasive, poorly controlled source of pollution. Mounting opposition by polluters, however, has led EPA to consider withdrawing or weakening parts of the Memorandum. We need to let EPA know that Californians and citizens across the country support strong federal leadership on reducing storm water pollution and restoring the health of polluted lakes, rivers, streams, estuaries and coastal waters.
Send your message!
http://www.cacoastkeeper.org/take-action/speak-out/9
Send your message!
http://www.cacoastkeeper.org/take-action/speak-out/9
Friday, May 6, 2011
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful commited citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has"
Hammerhead sharks are awesome ocean predators. These are some of the most powerful creatures in the sea, but even they can’t survive the brutal practice of shark finning… and it’s driving these and other sharks ever closer to extinction.
Imagine it: ripped from the water, these amazing animals are stripped of the dorsal fins that they need to swim and then left to bleed to death in the ocean.
It’s not a pretty picture, but it’s one that Californians like you can help change. And, the momentum is building since the introduction of legislation to ban the possession, sale, trade and distribution of shark fins, with more and more people coming out in support of AB 376.
Urge California lawmakers to support legislation to curb shark finning and save the lives of these awesome ocean predators.
Friday, April 29, 2011
"Individually, we are one drop. Together, we are an ocean."
Dear Supporter,
The U.S. Department of Justice is considering whether to prosecute BP for manslaughter in the explosion that killed 11 workers on an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico last year. BP could also be charged with deliberately understating the magnitude of the resulting oil gusher in an effort to limit the impact on its stock price.
If BP is not held accountable, its crimes will be repeated. BP has already returned to funding U.S. electoral campaigns. It is receiving major U.S. government contracts. And, it plans to resume drilling in the Gulf of Mexico later this year. Accountability can begin with enforcement of our laws.

This is the letter that will be sent by signing this petition-
The U.S. Department of Justice is considering whether to prosecute BP for manslaughter in the explosion that killed 11 workers on an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico last year. BP could also be charged with deliberately understating the magnitude of the resulting oil gusher in an effort to limit the impact on its stock price.
If BP is not held accountable, its crimes will be repeated. BP has already returned to funding U.S. electoral campaigns. It is receiving major U.S. government contracts. And, it plans to resume drilling in the Gulf of Mexico later this year. Accountability can begin with enforcement of our laws.
This is the letter that will be sent by signing this petition-
Dear Attorney General Holder,
We expect federal prosecutors to be fair and weigh all the evidence. But we also know that corporate criminals whose gross negligence causes death and destruction are often treated much more leniently than actual persons. Please don't allow that to happen in the case of BP.
Signed,
We expect federal prosecutors to be fair and weigh all the evidence. But we also know that corporate criminals whose gross negligence causes death and destruction are often treated much more leniently than actual persons. Please don't allow that to happen in the case of BP.
Signed,
Friday, April 22, 2011
Dear Earth,
Thank you so much for giving us a beautiful home, food to eat, and water to drink. I am really sorry for the way we treat you sometimes. It's so easy to forget sometimes how much you do for us. I just wanted to take a moment to say thank you from the bottom of my heart and I promise you that for the rest of my life I will do whatever I can to share your beauty and protect you with everything I have. Thank you Earth!
Your Friends and Protectors,
Coastal Playground
http://www.coastalplayground.com/
Your Friends and Protectors,
Coastal Playground
http://www.coastalplayground.com/
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
We Can't Wait for the Politicians, We Have to Create the Future that We Need Ourselves
"We will never have as much money as the oil companies, so we need a different currency to work in. We need bodies, we need creativity, we need spirit."
http://www.alternet.org/environment/150650/bill_mckibben:_we_can't_wait_for_the_politicians,_we_have_to_create_the_future_that_we_need_ourselves/
http://www.alternet.org/environment/150650/bill_mckibben:_we_can't_wait_for_the_politicians,_we_have_to_create_the_future_that_we_need_ourselves/
Monday, April 18, 2011
BP Shareholder Meeting tried to deny access for several Gulf Coast Representatives
Check out this article which documents the efforst of BP to try and keep quiet on the truths of the state of the Gulf Coast. And take a look at the statement from Keith Jones and the loss of his son on the oil rig explosion. The effects of this tragedy far extend the marine life disruption, it also disrupted the livelyhoods of many of our fellow workers and communities. Email your local Representatives and make them address this issue to help the Gulf Coast.
BP tries to block Gulf Coast Residents from Shareholder Meeting
BP tries to block Gulf Coast Residents from Shareholder Meeting
Monday, April 11, 2011
Conscious consumerism
Though capitalism appears to be the root cause of many of the world’s problems, it also supplies populations with the tools needed to resolve them: power. Power of the people, that is. With such an emphasis on consumerism, corporations inevitably find themselves dependent on the consumers themselves. It is because of their capacity to manipulate populations into herd mentalities that they have been able to control the thoughts of the masses. If the consumers themselves become aware of these tools of manipulation, they can reclaim that power and force Big Business to listen to their wants and needs. Conscious consumerism is what is required to overcome the status quo.
alternet.org
http://www.alternet.org/vision/149578/ethos%3A_new_documentary_calls_for_consumers_to_reclaim_power
alternet.org
http://www.alternet.org/vision/149578/ethos%3A_new_documentary_calls_for_consumers_to_reclaim_power
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
PLEASE HELP!
Monday, March 28, 2011
The Coastal Playground shop in now online!
With our new online Coastal Playground shop ordering is now much easier. Visit http://www.coastalplayground.com/ today!
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





